After Brussels, Will Voters Demand Foreign-Policy Experience?

Solidarity messages are written in chalk outside the stock exchange in Brussels on Tuesday, March 22, 2016.

Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP

AA Font size + Print

Solidarity messages are written in chalk outside the stock exchange in Brussels on Tuesday, March 22, 2016.

Trump wants waterboarding, Cruz wants to ‘secure’ Muslim neighborhoods in wake of attacks.

Will today’s horror in Brussels tilt Americans toward presidential candidates with foreign-policy experience—or simply whet their appetite for more red-meat, get-tough rhetoric?

Immediately after news broke of the rush-hour bombings, television networks raced to ask Donald Trump for reaction. (Trump gained 7 percent in the polls shortly after the Paris and San Bernardino attacks, statistician Nate Silver pointed out Tuesday on Twitter.) The front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination has been talking for months about banning Muslims from entering the United States. He didn’t disappoint.

Trump told journalists that America had to “close up our borders to people until we figure out what is going on” and that “we’re taking in people without real documentation…We don’t know where they’re coming from. We don’t know who they are. You look at them from any standpoint: They could be ISIS. They could be ISIS-related.”

The billionaire businessman also repeated his push for a return to “enhanced interrogation techniques.”

“Frankly, the waterboarding, if it was up to me, and if we changed the laws or had the laws, waterboarding would be fine,” Trump said. “If they could expand the laws, I would do a lot more than waterboarding.” 

Not to be outdone, Republican presidential candidate Texas Sen. Ted Cruz called a press conference to say that the Brussels attacks make clear “that this is a war.” Said Cruz, “we absolutely have to revisit our immigration policy across the board to prevent Islamic terrorists from coming in.”

Cruz also said this: “We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized.”

Other long-time Republicans, including those with foreign-policy experience, were more cautious. Tom Korologos, who served as President George W. Bush’s ambassador to Belgium from 2004 to 2007, described his shock at today’s attack.

“That was my second home and it still is,” Korologos said of Brussels. “We go back a lot and I am anxious quite frankly to see what the fatality list is.”

Korologos, who has attended every GOP presidential convention since 1972 and is now supporting Gov. John Kasich, cautioned against any overreaction in the face of the suicide bombings in the heart of Brussels.

“What we have here is a situation that is going to take some leadership and some guidance, somebody that knows it and has done it and has structure behind him and a support group that knows what the Middle East is,” he said. “We hadn’t better be sending any amateurs in to do a heavy-hitting job.”

Others renewed a call for more action. James Jeffrey, a former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, says that despite the horrible loss of life, he expects little change ahead in U.S. policy.

“These guys are just dangerous,” Jeffrey said of ISIS. “They need to be taken down and nobody is doing it.”

Jeffrey is among those who have long called for more active U.S. intervention in the fight against ISIS.

“They are just inflicting terror attack after terror attack and they are becoming part of the scenery, aren’t they?” Jeffrey said of ISIS. “The situation is you take down their little army and their little state out there in the desert and if President Obama doesn’t do it, no one will.”

Those fleeing bombings and murder at home now find the killings have followed them to Europe.

ISIS doesn’t represent Islam or the Syrian people,” said Fatima Ismail, a 23-year-old Syrian who lived under ISIS inside her country and is now working to help fellow refugees in Turkey. “ISIS did a lot of bad things, and I saw how they killed my neighbor. I want to send a message to the West that ISIS does not represent Islam.”

Getting that message to the American public has become both more urgent and more difficult. In December, a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll made news with its finding that “heightened fear of terrorism is rippling through the electorate, thrusting national-security issues to the center of the 2016 presidential campaign.” One month later, Politico noted that “the polls vary, but after attacks in Paris, California and Philadelphia, security of the homeland has jumped from a low-single digit issue to the top concern of nearly 20 percent of voters, according to multiple senior Republican lawmakers and aides.”

Today, Brussels is added to that grim list. And national security once again returns to the fore.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

    Download
  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

    Download
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    Download
  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.