Weapons of the Syrian War: Suicide Bombers

The tactic is often used in offensive operations, just after an artillery barrage and before the advance of hundreds of foot soldiers.

Editor’s note: This series examines 10 categories of arms used in the Syrian conflict, a ghastly proving ground for much of what 21st-century militaries and militant groups can bring to war.


First use: December 23, 2011. Two al-Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra bombers struck security buildings in the Damascus city center, killing 44.

Nusra militants struck again in July 2012, in downtown Damascus, killing President Assad’s defense minister along with several senior members of the military and intelligence staffs. By the end of a bloody 2012, Nusra had taken credit for 41 of the 50 suicide attacks that killed Syrians, The Long War Journal noted.

The suicide bomber is the modern-day “makeshift precision guided munition.”
Armament Research

Evidence of the Islamic State’s use of suicide bombers isn’t difficult to locate on the web. Here’s a look at recent Islamic State propaganda in which the group claims 41 suicide attacks in Syria and 100 more in Iraq during the month of June.

A harbinger for Syria? By mid-2016, suicide bombings were on the rise in Iraqi cities where government forces had forced ISIS out, such as Ramadi and Fallujah, or where the group was on the defensive, such as Mosul. Other factions inside Syria use the tactic more often in offensive operations: first comes an artillery barrage, then suicide bombs, heavy weaponry, and hundreds of militants on foot acting as a light infantry force to swarm and overwhelm defenses.


Suicide vest reportedly recovered from Syria December 2015.


Improvised munitions: In Syria and Iraq, if fighters can tape a bomb to it, it’s probably been used in a car bomb, roadside bomb, or suicide attack. Explosively-rigged copies of the Quran were reportedly discovered in an Iraqi town ISIS left in February, according to the U.S. military.

Costs: between $25 and $265 for roadside bomb varieties like those that proliferated during the Iraq war, tactics a revived al-Qaeda brought to Syria.

Insurgency economics: U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan who found an IED on the battlefield frequently summoned nearby aerial surveillance aircraft, the costs of which could soar into the many thousands of dollars per flight hour. And if you’re out of drones, your manned platforms start at nearly $18,000—for a bomb that often costs less than $300 to produce.

High-end IEDs: If planners want to use triacetone triperoxide (TATP, aka “mother of Satan”) to replicate a Brussels-like attack, they’ll probably need between $10,000 and 15,000, said Jonathan Schanzer, former U.S. Treasury terrorism finance analyst and now of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.


OverviewSmall ArmsTanksArtilleryAirpower (Syrian)Anti‑Aircraft WeaponsBarrel BombsChemical WeaponsAirpower (Non‑Syrian)Cruise MissilesSuicide BombersAdvisors

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download
  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

    Download
  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

    Download
  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

    Download
  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.