Karzai: No U.S. Troop Deal Before April Elections

Rahmat Gul/AP

AA Font size + Print

After reaching an agreement to keep U.S. troops past 2014, Afghan President Hamid Karzai now wants to wait until April’s presidential election to sign it. By Stephanie Gaskell

Afghan President Hamid Karzai reached a deal with the United States to keep troops past the 2014 withdrawal. Now he doesn’t want to ratify it until a successor is picked to replace him in April’s election.

Just a day after announcing that the two nations had negotiated a bilateral security agreement that would allow U.S. and NATO troops to operate in Afghanistan until 2024, Karzai told a gathering of Afghan elders to wait until the election takes place in April to sign the deal, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The agreement should be signed when the election is conducted, properly and with dignity,” Karzai told the loya jirga, a meeting of thousands of Afghan elders assembled to decide whether to approve the deal. “There is mistrust between me and America. I don’t trust them, and they don’t trust me.”

Karzai’s spokesman, Aimal Faizi, confirmed Karzai’s stunning statement, telling the Journal that “peace, security and a good election are key to the signing” of the security agreement.

Karzai also showed the leaders a letter from President Obama, assuring him that coalition troops would “respect the sanctity and dignity of Afghans in their homes” but did not offer up an apology.

Many Afghans have expressed worry that Karzai would try to influence the outcome of the election, and this latest demand quickly fed into those fears. “It came as a surprise,” Hedayat Amin Arsala, Karzai’s former vice president who resigned as senior minister last month to contest the presidential election, told WSJ. “This may be misconstrued as if the president wants someone specific [to win] in the elections. I hope that is not the case.”

The Obama administration is eager to get a security deal in place before the April election, and before next year’s fighting season begins in the spring. Still, defense officials have often said there is “time and space” to get a deal in place before the withdrawal at the end of next year.

The agreement gives U.S. troops immunity from prosecution by Afghanistan — the key sticking point that led to a failure to keep U.S. troops in Iraq after the war ended in 2011. The Loya Jirga is now debating the deal — and whether to postpone a decision.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

    View
  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

    View
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.