Russia hits CIA-backed rebels; Tide shifts to Afghans in Kunduz; Kendall warns about defense mergers; Bombings in China; and a bit more.

Russia bombs CIA-backed rebels in Syria. U.S. officials say Moscow is not hitting Islamic State militants in Syria, as its leaders have claimed, but are instead bombing anti-government fighters. “In a second day of raids in Syria, Russian warplanes carried out 30 airstrikes on Thursday in the northern province of Idlib that targeted not the Islamic State but a rival insurgent coalition,” the New York Times reports.

“One of the airstrikes hit an area primarily held by rebels backed by the Central Intelligence Agency and allied spy services, U.S. officials said, catapulting the Syrian crisis to a new level of danger and uncertainty. Moscow’s entry means the world’s most powerful militaries—including the U.S., Britain and France—now are flying uncoordinated combat missions, heightening the risk of conflict in the skies over Syria.” The Wall Street Journal, here.

How did the U.S. find out Russia was about to start bombing? “A Russian general attached to the newly created intelligence center set up by the Russians, Syrians, Iranians and Iraqis in Baghdad went to the U.S. embassy and notified the defense attaché that Russia was going to begin flying airstrikes in Syria in an hour, according to the U.S. official,” ABC News reports.

The Pentagon is rejecting Russia’s call to stay away, Defense One’s Molly O’Toole reports. “The coalition will continue to fly missions over Iraq and Syria as planned, as we did today,” Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Wednesday.

Indeed, coalition aircraft struck two ISIS excavators near Mar’a on Wednesday, Central Command said in a release.

“The dynamic has changed,” one U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast of the situation in Syria now that Russia has jumped into the fray. More here.

Who’s fighting whom in Syria? Here’s a NYT explainer.

Afghans retake Kunduz? Afghan officials told local TV that a five-hour operation, supported by coalition airstrikes, had cleared the city by early Thursday morning. “It is jubilant at what will be seen as a crucial victory in the battle against the Taliban insurgency,” BBC reports. “This is a huge blow for the Taliban,” Sediq Sediqqi, spokesperson for the interior minister said. “It proves Afghan special forces are elite fighters who can win battles.”

But a Taliban spokesman said his side still holds Kunduz, and that their flag was still flying over the city.

U.S. actions near Kunduz: “U.S. aircraft launched six airstrikes since Tuesday to protect coalition forces in the area. U.S. Army Col. Brian Tribus said coalition servicemen are in the Kunduz area ‘to advise and assist’ Afghan security forces.” USA Today has more here.

What does Kunduz mean in the big picture? From The New York Times: “Beyond questions about why American-trained forces collapsed so quickly, the issues raised by that long-term campaign of Taliban incursion illuminate a potentially grave threat to the American-backed Afghan government: The insurgents’ past aversion to all-out attacks against big cities may not have been because they never thought it possible, but merely because they weren’t ready until now.” More here.

CIA stands up its new Directorate for Digital Innovation, its first new directorate since 1963. Defense One’s Patrick Tucker visted agency headquarters in Langley, Va., for an exclusive interview with Deputy Director Andrew Hallman, who will lead the new office. More here.


From Defense One

Help us out! Are you getting your D Brief every weekday without fail? Does it look right, and do the links work? If not, we’d love to hear from you. Drop us a note at the-d-brief@defenseone.com — you may have to type it if your links aren’t working — and thanks.

Pentagon leaders call out Lockheed Martin, large defense firms. Acquisition chief Frank Kendall said Lockheed’s $9 billion purchase of Blackhawk helicopter maker Sikorsky shows how giant defense firms are reducing competition. “With size comes power, and the department’s experience with large defense contractors is that they are not hesitant to use this power for corporate advantage,” Kendall told reporters, including Defense One’s Global Business Reporter Marcus Weisgerber.

Carter chimes in: “Mergers of top-tier firms would not be good “for the taxpayer and warfighter in the long run,” the SecDef said at his own press conference.

How does Lockheed feel about Kendall’s comments? “We understand and respect the department’s concern about maintaining a proper balance between an efficient and competitive industrial base,” the company said in a written statement provided by a spokeswoman. “However, we believe that defense contractors should continue to be assessed based on the performance and effectiveness of the products and solutions offered, not on the size of their company.” More here.

How NGA is turning disaster-relief mapping into a game. A q-and-a about GeoQ, the open-source disaster mapping system from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, by NextGov’s Mohana Ravindranath, here.

On Tuesday, October 6—join DOD acquisition head Frank Kendall as he keynotes Defense One LIVE’s “The State of Defense Acquisition” in Crystal City, Va. Catch the full agenda and register for your spot right here.

Happy New (Fiscal) Year! And welcome to Thursday’s edition of The D Brief, from Marcus Weisgerber and Defense One. Want to share The D Brief with a friend? Here’s our subscribe link. And please tell us what you like, don’t like, or want to drop on our radar right here at the-d-brief@defenseone.com.


The government is open today. Just before midnight, President Obama signed a stop-gap measure to fund the federal government through Dec. 11, giving lawmakers until then to pass federal spending legislation for the remainder of the fiscal year. “The bill is intended to buy more time for Obama, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and the next Speaker to reach a comprehensive, long-term budget pact,” The Hill reports.

Carter tells Obama to veto defense policy bill. “While the bill would authorize $612 billion for the Defense Department — the same amount the White House has requested — it would leave budget caps known as sequester in place, but funnel $38 billion through a war fund not subject to the caps,” The Hill writes.

No legislation to close GITMO in NDAA. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said the White House left him no choice but to put an effective legislative freeze on closing the military prison at Guantanamo in the conference report of the defense authorization bill. And the White House is not happy about it. “The Administration strongly objects to provisions of the bill that would impede efforts to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,” a senior administration official said. “The President’s defense strategy depends on investing every dollar where it will have the greatest effect, and the hundreds of millions of dollars spent operating the Guantanamo detention facility each year could be better allocated to other national security priorities.”

Coming soon: the White House plan to close Guantanamo, promised some months ago, according to House Armed Services Ranking Member Adam Smith, D-Wash.

Here are eight takeaways from the NDAA from long-time Capitol Hill staffer Justin Johnson, now at the conservative Heritage Foundation, here.

F-35 ejection-seat woes. “During August tests of the ejection seat, built by Martin-Baker, testers discovered an increased risk of neck injury when a lightweight pilot is flying at slower speeds. Until the problem is fixed, the services decided to restrict pilots weighing under 136 pounds from operating the plane, Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Harrigian, F-35 integration office director, told Defense News in a Tuesday interview.” More here.

Air Force bomber contract still a “couple of months” out. At a House hearing earlier this week, Lt. Gen. Arnie Bunch, the Air Force’s deputy assistant secretary of acquisition, said “we still have details that we still haven’t worked through” before awarding the contract. “Bunch’s remarks come as a surprise to some in the aerospace community, who had expected a contract award for the Long Range Strike Bomber first this summer, then early fall, and most recently in mid-October,” Defense News reports. More here.

McCain says something nice about the Air Force tanker. The Arizona senator, who helped expose corruption in an plan to lease aerial tankers last decade, took note of progress in the KC-46A program, which flew for the first time last week. “I applaud Boeing for absorbing the cost overruns that occurred, along with the schedule delays, and remain cautiously optimistic that Boeing will meet its contractual obligation of delivering 18 KC-46A aircraft by August 2017,” McCain said in a statement.

Saudis say they intercepted Iranian weapons bound for Yemen. “A coalition statement said 14 Iranian sailors were detained on the boat, which was carrying 18 anti-armored Concourse shells, 54 anti-tank shells, shell-battery kits, firing guidance systems, launchers and batteries for binoculars.” Reuters, here.

Bombings in China kill seven, injure more than 50. “A spokesperson from the state-run CCTV said the bombs were caused by explosive devices sent to these buildings in packages in the mail. Reuters reports that ‘disaffected or mentally unstable’ Chinese people have set off explosives in a similar fashion before, and that the Chinese authorities refer to these attacks as ‘sudden incidents’ resulting from public anger toward the government.” Quartz, here.

Army issues breastfeeding policy. A 7-point memo from Secretary John McHugh makes the Army the final military branch to issue a servicewide breastfeeding policy, Army Times reports. “Although there is much more work to do to support Army moms, the changes announced today are a positive first step,” Rep. Niki Tsongas, D-Mass., said in a statement. More on the policy, plus McHugh’s memo, here.

Dempsey named fellow at Duke. Gen. Martin Dempsey, who retired as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last week, will teach at Duke University next year. “In the spring, he will co-teach a course in the Sanford School of Public Policy on American civil-military relations with Duke political scientist Peter Feaver. In the fall, Dempsey will teach a course on management and leadership at the Fuqua School of Business,” the school said in a statement. More here.

Vet pays $33,000 to install bulletproof glass at recruiting center. “Roy Drinkard, a 95-year-old World War II veteran, paid to install bulletproof glass at the Cullman, Alabama, military recruiting center in the wake of the July attack on a recruiting station in Chattanooga, Tennessee, that targeted military personnel.” Military Times, here.

Did a drunk Navy sailor use a raccoon to bypass a breathalyzer test? No, but the San Diego Union-Tribune asks: “Why question the truth when the story is this good?” Here’s the bogus story that stemmed from a fake incident report posted on the Internet: “After a night of drinking, it read, a petty officer 1st class failed the breathalyzer test that allows his car to start. In a moment of alcohol-fueled ingenuity, he visited a nearby park, kidnapped a raccoon, and forced the creature to blow into the machine.” Read the rest of the fictitious account here.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.