Who is Capt. Jeremy Haynes?; Yemen on the brink; Thornberry has a plan as the Pentagon shuffles papers; France is the new U.K.; Broadwell doesn’t like “mistress”; And a bit more.

Ash Carter hosted an “enhanced” honor cordon on the steps of the Pentagon’s River Entrance early this morning to welcome Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, who arrived in D.C. last night. Defense Secretary Carter is speaking right now at the Pentagon about the sacrifices that the more than 850,000 U.S. troops have made over the years in Afghanistan. He’ll single out at least two: A Navy lieutenant named Lonn Larson, currently deployed to eastern Afghanistan – and whose wife Mary Ann and young daughter, Reese, are attending this morning.

Carter will also talk a lot about Captain Jeremy Haynes, aide to Maj. Gen. Harold Greene, the Army general officer who was killed in an attack last year. Haynes was seriously wounded in the same attack and paralyzed from the waist down. But amazingly, the day before New Year’s Eve, the Haynes family celebrated Jeremy Haynes’ first steps since the attack. Haynes, Carter will say this morning, has resolved to pass the Army’s physical fitness test now. Haynes, his wife Chelsea and other members of his family are also at the Pentagon this morning.

Attending the event this morning: Carter and Bob Work, John Kerry (State), Jim Clapper (DNI), John Brennan (CIA), Alfonso Lenhardt (USAID), Avril Haines, (NSC) and Adm. Sandy Winnefeld (JCS).

Also attending this morning: About 200 U.S. service members handpicked from around the Pentagon who have served in Afghanistan. President Hamid Karzai was notoriously dismissive of the role U.S. service members played in the war in Afghanistan, blaming them for civilian casualties and the like.

In marked contrast, Ghani is effusive in his praise for what U.S. troops do in Afghanistan and thanks them repeatedly. As the Pentagon prepared for this morning’s event, the services were each asked to send at least 40 service members who had fought in Afghanistan. Others who weren’t specifically asked were told they could show at this morning’s event as well.

Obama this week is expected to announce a slowdown to the drawdown in Afghanistan. But he’s still wedded to removing all but a handful of troops by the end of next year. After first announcing his drawdown plans for Afghanistan last year, Obama is now open to tweaking the plan to allow commanders more flexibility in Afghanistan. It comes with the recognition that President Ghani and Afghan Chief Executive Officer Abdullah Abdullah are both enthusiastic American partners and have urged Obama to reconsider the drawdown plan, that would have left less than 6,000 troops there by the end of the year and all but a handful in Afghanistan by the end of next year. There are now about 10,000 troops in Afghanistan. But while Obama will likely announce that the “off-ramp” of troops over the next two years won’t be as steep, he doesn’t appear to be budging on the plan to remove all but an embassy-sized contingent by the end of 2016.

White House officials on Friday said the focus of the conversations over troop levels is about this year and next; but indicated that the door would be left open to consider changes to the deployment of U.S. forces after 2016.

The WaPo’s Missy Ryan and Greg Jaffe: “Today, the Afghanistan war, despite increasing levels of violence, is largely invisible to the U.S. public. American casualties have plummeted in recent months as U.S. trainers have largely retreated to fortified bases. Only highly trained American counterterrorism forces venture out with any regularity.

“…Obama probably wouldn’t pay a price politically for keeping the current level of U.S. troops in the country through the remainder of his presidency. His imperative to withdraw from Afghanistan seems to be a personal one.” Read the rest here.

Ghani says ISIS is in Afghanistan. Officials and senior military officers have said this in the past – that militants from the Islamic State have spread into Afghanistan. It’s both a concerning reality and an attempt to persuade the White House that removing most U.S. troops from Afghanistan by 2017 isn’t in anyone’s best interests.

NBC News this morning: “ISIS is operating inside Afghanistan and eyeing the country as a strategic foothold in its broader war to establish a caliphate in the Middle East, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani told NBC News. In an interview, Ghani said that Afghanistan has evidence ISIS is organizing inside the country.

Ghani, to NBC’s Andrea Mitchell: "Fortunately, we've prevented them from acting… But we have sufficient evidence that they were targeting us because to their narrative, to their story line, Afghanistan is central." More here.

Ghani is neither brooding, or agitated or suspicious or openly belligerent: For Obama, Hamid Karzai was everything that Ghani isn’t. The NYT’s Mike Shear and Matt Rosenberg, here.

Five things to look for out of the Ghani visit, by Paul Shinkman of U.S. News, here.

Welcome to Monday’s edition of The D Brief, Defense One's first-read national security newsletter by Gordon Lubold with Ben Watson.

If you’d like to subscribe to The D Brief, reply to this email and let us know, subscribe here or drop us a line at glubold@defenseone.com. Please send us your tips, your tidbits, your scoops and stories, your think tank reports and best of all your candy, but send it to us early for maximum tease. And whatever you do, we hope you'll follow us @glubold and @natsecwatson.

Mac Thornberry is flexing his muscles as the new chairman of the House Armed Services Committee – he’s proposing acquisition reform this morning at CSIS. Defense One’s own Marcus Weisgerber: “For years, lawmakers and defense officials have looked for ways to remove bureaucratic red tape from the Pentagon’s cumbersome acquisition process and find something nobody yet has: a way to save taxpayer money and get cutting edge weapons and technology to troops faster. 

This week House Armed Services Committee Chairman [Thornberry, R-Texas,] will unveil plans to make the Defense Department’s procurement system more efficient, committee aids said. At the center of his initial plan is removing bureaucracy from the managers of the Pentagon’s multimillion and multibillion-dollar projects.”

“…Thornberry will reveal his proposal during a Monday morning speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in Washington, and plans to introduce the legislation later this week.”

A senior committee staff member to Weisgerber on Pentagon hierarchy: “Right now they’re not managing their programs, they’re managing paperwork between the cubicles between [the] A and the E ring.” Read the rest here.

The Washington Examiner’s Tara Copp on Thornberry’s proposals: “…In previous decades, the long wait to navigate all of the Pentagon acquisition steps and paperwork — much of which was due to previous congressional requirements — was tolerable. The U.S. had a large technological advantage over potential adversaries, so it had a cushion for those delays. But that cushion has eroded, if not disappeared completely, as countries such as China and Russia have come up to speed on critical technologies including electronic warfare, surveillance, stealth and propulsion. In short, in Thornberry's eyes, the nation's security can't afford the bureaucratic drag anymore.” More here.

The Air Force may have to protect money  laundering - in space. Defense One’s Patrick Tucker: “If you’re looking for the ultimate in physical security for your future assets, look up, way up. Growing fears about cybersecurity and the rapidly decreasing cost to access space has given birth to a new class of startups offering satellite-based data centers impervious to all physical hacking. What sort of information is so valuable that the average person needs to protect them in space? One answer: money. Even space vaults need guards, and in this case the brunt of that job will go to U.S. Air Force.” Read the rest of this tale here.

Speaking of Thornberry: How Congress and the White House plan to boost defense spending: ignore sequestration. Defense One’s Molly O’Toole: The House and the Senate may have found a sweet spot for their budget strategies: they’re both planning on using the U.S. war chest to give the Pentagon the money the White House requested for defense, but outside the reach of sequestration’s spending caps.” Read the rest of that here.

Republican Ted Cruz from Texas just announced his intention to run for the presidency on Twitter.  @Ted Cruz: “I’m running for president and I hope to earn your support!” More here.

Meantime, the U.S. pulled the remaining U.S. forces out of Yemen as more chaos, turmoil and Houthi consolidation ensue. Over the weekend, the Pentagon announced that it was removing the remaining American forces – about 100 U.S. special operators – from Yemen as the situation there deteriorated all the more. This morning, all are out. And a United Nations envoy said Yemen, once a strong ally in the U.S. fight against terrorism, is on the verge of civil war.

Al Jazeera this hour: “Events in Yemen are pushing the country ‘to the edge of a civil war,’ the United Nations special envoy has warned, calling for all parties to resolve the escalating conflict peacefully as peace talks reach a stalemate. 

“Speaking to the UN Security Council emergency meeting via videolink on Sunday, Jamal Benomar, who has tried to mediate the deepening conflict for several months, said that if immediate steps are not taken ‘the country will slide further into further violence and dislocation’.

Benomar: “In conclusion, I urge all sides in spite of rising tensions to appreciate the gravity of the situation and to de-escalate by ceasing all hostilities and refraining from provocations and using violence." Read more here.

The Islamic State has published the names of 100 U.S. service members on a Web site urging its members to kill them – using names, photos and “purported addresses” to do so. Mike Schmidt and Helene Cooper in the NYT on Sunday: “…The group said that the personnel had participated in efforts to defeat it in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere. Defense Department and F.B.I. officials said that they were aware of the website and were investigating the posting.

“It does not appear that the information had been hacked from government servers. One Defense Department official, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said that most of the information could be found in public records, residential address search sites and social media.” More here.

The German Marshall Fund’s Brussels forum was held over the weekend and Michele Flournoy and Gen. Phil Breedlove, of NATO/EUCOM, talked about the future of conflict. Watch that here.

Also from the GMF Brussels forum, Bloomberg’s Josh Rogin reports that Russia is still pouring arms into Ukraine. That bit, here.

France is the new U.K. Agence France-Press’s Dan De Luce: “Once a source of irritation for the United States, France has nudged aside Britain to become the US military's key European partner.

The growing ties between the two militaries were on display this month when France's top military officer, Gen. Pierre de Villiers, hosted his US counterpart, General Martin Dempsey, aboard France's aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle. The French flagship, which arrived in the Gulf in February to take part in US-led air strikes on the Islamic State group, is operating under US command — a first for the French naval forces.

“…One French officer boasted to AFP: "France at the moment is the most activist, most engaged European ally."

Over the past decade, France initially sought defense partners inside the European Union but found itself frustrated with Germany's more cautious view of military power.” Read the rest of De Luce’s story here.

The U.S. must “pummel” ISIS, writes Colin Dueck and Roger Zakheim in The National Interest: “…The rise of ISIS, together with its demonstrated brutality, have triggered a sea-change in American popular attitudes, at least on this particular issue. One Quinnipiac poll from March 4 found that 62 percent of all Americans now support the use of U.S. ground troops versus ISIS, as against only 30 percent who oppose. So a two-to-one majority of U.S. public opinion today supports not only the use of force, but the use of American ground troops against the Islamic State. The majorities supporting U.S. airstrikes are even more overwhelming.” More here.

Can U.S. service members bridge the military-civilian divide when they become more public figures? Military Times’ Oriana Pawlyk: “…experts warn that the way Iraq and Afghanistan veterans often are portrayed in mainstream media, movies and TV shows doesn't necessarily enhance the public's perception of veterans — and often makes veterans feel even more alienated. Military and civic leaders have discussed for years the military-civilian ‘gap’ — the social and cultural disconnect between those who have served and those who have not — in various studies, articles and other venues.” More here.

Air Force Secretary Debbie James honored Sen. Orrin Hatch’s fallen brother on Friday. We missed running this on Friday morning – apologies. But The Hill’s Kristina Wong covered the event, at which James celebrated the service of Hatch’s brother, Jesse, who was killed during World War II. Wong: Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), now 81, was just eight years old when his brother was killed in World War II. However, it left a lasting mark on the rest of his life. His brother, 20-year-old Jesse, was an Army corporal serving as a nose turret gunner when his B-24 bomber went down over Austria. 

Just weeks after his family received word, a streak in young Hatch's hair turned completely white, and stayed that way until all of it turned white many years later. Jesse was first reported missing in action. ‘My mother believed that he would come back,’ Hatch said. The family would receive confirmation two years later.

“…[James] presented Hatch and his surviving sisters Frances and Jessica with shadow boxes honoring Jesse's service. Within one shadow box was a picture of Cpl. Hatch and his nine other fallen crew from the 15th Air Force, 451st Bombardment Group, then based out of Castellucio Airfield, Italy. 

Said Air Force Secretary James: "Men of this unit were ordinary men. They were ordinary airmen, but they rose to extraordinary heights 70 years ago.” More here.

The Pentagon announced the deployment of a Multiple Launch Rocket System, or MLRS, to the Korean peninsula on Friday. But Pentagon officials insisted that this was planned more than a couple of years ago and had nothing to do with any new threat on the peninsula. Also, the systems are being deployed across the Army – not just to South Korea. DoD, here.

Whatever happened to… Paula Broadwell? One thing, the former girlfriend of Dave Petraeus doesn’t like the word “mistress.” The Charlotte Observer’s Peter St. Onge, here.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.