Budget Day; Alleged madam peddled access to Trump; GLCM parts restart; Critics decry ‘allied protection racket’; And a bit more.

It’s Budget Day, and the president has nothing on his schedule. In his federal budget plan for fiscal 2020—at least some of whose details are set for an 11:30 a.m. release—we’re told to expect an $8.6-billion request for segments of the southern border wall, CBS News’ Mark Knoller reports.

Admin note: “Usually, presidents want to be part of the discussion on budget day, but at this writing, [President Trump] has no public or press appearances,” Knoller added. “Could change. He's got weekly lunch” with Vice President Mike Pence.

Topline details revealed by unnamed administration officials on Sunday evening: the budget will include “$750 billion in military spending, and 5 percent cuts in non-defense domestic discretionary spending across the board. Total spending cuts would total $2.7 trillion over 10 years, the administration official said, with the goal of balancing the budget by 2034.”

That $750 billion figure confirms a plan to put almost one-quarter of the budget into OCO. As D1’s Marcus Weisgerber never tires of pointing out, DOD’s budget is legally capped at $576 billion in 2020, so the Trump administration will attempt to persuade Congress to accept the $174 billion balance in the Overseas Contingency Operations fund, the “emergency supplemental” intended for use for unforeseen crises. (Don't miss our December podcast with budget guru Todd Harrison on the $750 billion military, here.)

Another thing we know from this new budget, via Knoller: “OMB says the 5% non-defense budget cuts would total $2.7-trillion, but it will take until 2034 to reach a balanced budget. Throws aside Pres Trump's campaign pledge to eliminate the National Debt in 8 years.”

Army’s share: “The Army is asking for around $190 billion in fiscal year 2020, an increase of roughly $8 billion above last year’s budget top line, which will cover the cost of the advent of an ambitious modernization plan,” service officials tell Defense News’ Jen Judson (roaring back from maternity leave to get the scoop).

Another take: Susanna Blume and Christopher Dougherty from Center for a New American Security have a preview entitled “What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Defense Budget Masterpiece” over at War on the Rocks.

Some of their advice: “The 2020 budget request should prioritize investment in advanced military capabilities over increasing the size of the force. Any growth in force size should either be focused on defeating Chinese and Russian strategies or should enable a more cost-effective approach to counter-terrorism and irregular warfare.”

We should see more money and planning for space and nuclear forces, the authors write, alongside more work from the Army "researching and developing unmanned vehicles and manned-unmanned teaming concepts to reduce long-term manpower costs." Lots more, here.


From Defense One

Critics Blast Trump ‘Protection Racket’ Offer as ‘Pure Idiocy’ // Kevin Baron: The White House's cost plus 50 plan would require allies to pay 150% of American troop costs. Former commanders say it only hurts U.S. interests.

The US Army Is Trying to Bury the Lessons of the Iraq War // Frank Sobchak, co-author of the Iraq War Study: By scuttling plans to help its leaders understand what went wrong, the service is turning a blind eye to insights of enduring relevance.

Inside DARPA's Ambitious 'AI Next' Program // Jack Corrigan, Nextgov: The defense research agency seeks artificial intelligence tools capable of human-like communication and logical reasoning that far surpass today’s tech.

Will John Bolton Bring on Armageddon—Or Stave It Off? // Graeme Wood, The Atlantic: The national security adviser could be our best hope for protecting the world from Donald Trump’s impulses

Welcome to this Monday edition of The D Brief by Ben Watson and Bradley Peniston. Thanks for reading! And if you’re not subscribed, you can do that here. On this day in 1940, the U.S. lifted its arms embargo on Curtiss P-40 Warhawk fighters planes so France and Britain could begin acquiring them.


Florida massage parlor owner who sold access to Trump has connections to Chinese government. On Friday, the Miami Herald had this startling headline: “Trump cheered Patriots to Super Bowl victory with founder of spa where Kraft was busted.”
The story quickly took a national-security turn: “If the President of the United States is letting a Chinese madam sell access at Mar-a-Lago to Chinese business people while his friends are getting serviced at businesses she started, he is making himself and the country vulnerable to massive blackmail risk. It is a textbook story of how foreign actors gain leverage over senior officials,” wrote David Rothkopf at The Daily Beast.
But the implications run deeper than blackmail: Mother Jones reported that Li Yang, who has donated to Trump’s election fund:

  1. [R]uns an investment business that has offered to sell Chinese clients access to Trump and his family. And a website for the business—which includes numerous photos of Yang and her purported clients hobnobbing at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s private club in Palm Beach—suggests she had some success in doing so.” And —
  2. She “is an officer of two groups with ties to China’s Communist government.”

White House mute: “spokeswoman Sarah Sanders did not respond to questions about security issues raised by Yang’s access.” Read on, here.

U.S. will restart making parts for long-banned missile. “The U.S. Defense Department will begin fabricating components for new ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) systems formerly banned under the terms of the now-suspended Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty,” a DOD spokesman tells Aviation Week. Its production was approved by the 2017 authorization act.
Its predecessor: here’s a grainy video of America’s Cold War GLCM. The BGM-109G Gryphon entered service in 1983 and was scrapped pursuant to the INF treaty in 1991. Savannah River National Laboratory eulogized the missile as “strongly destabilizing,” explaining, “The high accuracy and short flight times of the INF-range missiles between the Soviet Union and NATO countries created a serious First-Strike Stability issue for the two sides.”
Russia’s own newish GLCM, the 9M728 (R500) Iskander cruise missile, is the reason the Trump administration is giving for the U.S. withdrawal.

Happening today and tomorrow in Washington: the 30th iteration of the Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference.
Featured speakers: America’s North Korean envoy, Stephen Biegun. He takes the stage at 11 a.m. EDT. Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Andrea Thompson spoke first today. Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) is tomorrow’s early speaker (at 8:45 a.m. EDT).
A few sessions that caught our attention:

  • Nuclear Endgames on the Korean Peninsula
  • The Future of U.S.-Russia Arms Control
  • U.S.-Russian Strategic Relations: The Big Picture
  • Can a Rules-Based Nuclear Order be Enforced?
  • Could a Nuclear War Remain Limited?
  • Command-and-Control Vulnerability: Are There Solutions to a Growing Problem?
  • Women of Mass Destruction: Telling Our Story. Find the full agenda (PDF), here.

Catch the livestream via CEIP’s site today, here.

The more you know: missile-defense edition. “A higher percentage of American believe our midcourse missile defense works (~77 percent) than the percentage of actual successful intercepts even under controlled conditions (~57 percent),” MIT’s Vipin Narang tweeted after reading a recent op-ed in The Wall Street Journal entitled “Living with a Nuclear North Korea.”
In that op-ed you’ll learn “77% of our respondents believe that it is highly likely or somewhat likely that 'current U.S. missile defenses could successfully destroy all the North Korean missiles before they reached their targets.'” (h/t Ankit Panda for this find)
One possible takeaway: “missile defense is all about politics and feels, not actual security,” policy analyst Brian Weeden tweeted in reply. “Trying to argue against [missile defense] with stats and physics is a [losing] strategy.”
Find our multimedia missile defense review explainer from last June — full of all kinds of data like stats and physics — over here. Or if you’re in a hurry, you can skip straight to the six-minute video, here.

Iran-backed hackers are believed to have stolen at least six terabytes of data from Citrix, the "major software company that handles sensitive computer projects for the White House communications agency, the U.S. military, the FBI and many American corporations," NBC reported Friday.
Known-knowns: Several employee accounts were compromised using “brute force attacks that guess passwords," the cybersecurity firm Resecurity told NBC.
Unknown: “over what time period it had come under the cyberattack, how many employee accounts may have been compromised,” and rather a lot more, NBC writes.
Suspected culprits: the Iranian-linked hacking group known as Iridium. More here.

In London, MI5 blocked a suspected Russian spy from entering the country last summer, “five months after the chemical weapons attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury,” the Sunday Times reported this weekend.
Blocked: Umar Sugaipov, since "MI5 had received intelligence that he planned to murder Akhmed Zakayev, a former prime minister of Chechnya and an enemy of President Vladimir Putin." A tiny bit more in front of the paywall, here; or vi Mail Online’s summary, here.

Russia says its added more of its troops to illegally annexed Crimea, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said at a meeting of the State Duma’s Defense Committee, according to state-run TASS.
Shoigu: "The force grouping in Crimea has been reinforced, this ensures protection of the peninsula’s territory and Russia’s interests in the Black Sea."
Writes Tech Editor Patrick Tucker: “This troop reinforcement could provide support for a new land assault northward to seize water or more Black Sea operations.” For more, read Tucker’s Black Sea tensions review, here; and find his 2019 forecast, here.  
Meanwhile in actual Russia, "more than 15,000 people gathered in Moscow on Sunday" protesting "against plans to introduce tighter restrictions on the internet," the BBC reported citing figures from activists — figures which were double those reported by police.
What's going on here: "The government says the so-called digital sovereignty bill will reduce Russia's reliance on internet servers in the United States. It seeks to stop the country's internet traffic being routed through foreign servers." More from the BBC, here. More about that internet-cutting work from Moscow, also via Defense One’s Patrick Tucker, here.

Back stateside, “For the first time in its history, the U.S. government is detaining more than 50,000 people it says are undocumented immigrants in jails and prisons around the country,” The Daily Beast’s Spencer Ackerman reported Friday.
And ICYMI, the Pentagon is looking for “space to house up to 5,000 unaccompanied alien children on DoD installations, if needed, through September 30, 2019,” a Defense Department spokesman announced in an emailed message to reporters Thursday evening.
That new detention-facility hunt comes at the request of the Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services and that department’s hunt for “temporary shelter for unaccompanied alien children,” the Pentagon statement read.

And finally today: What the Navy Can Learn From the Fyre Festival,” the much-hyped and ultimately ill-fated event that’s become the focus of two recent documentaries. Commander Tom Clarity, operations officer for the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76), tackled the subject of that festival in a blog post for the U.S. Naval Institute.
What he found: “A case study of organizational dysfunction that is easily transferable to a military audience.”
Commander Clarity’s quick tips: “listen to dissenting opinions, establish reasonable expectations,” and two more, here.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.