A terror-designation first; US troops die in Afghanistan; Turmoil atop DHS; Army wants mind-reading AI; And a bit more.

In a first, the Trump administration designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization on Monday. The U.S. State Department had never before designated a part of another government as a terrorist organization, Voice of America writes. The declaration, “which takes effect in one week and includes the IRGC’s elite secretive Quds Force, means it will be a federal crime to provide any type of support to the IRGC.”

Need a review of the IRGC? Find it at this explainer from the Council on Foreign Relations. For a shorter take, Reuters writes this: "Comprising an estimated 125,000-strong military with army, navy and air units, the Guards also command the Basij, a religious volunteer paramilitary and control Iran’s missile programs. Its overseas Quds forces have fought Iran’s proxy wars in the region. The U.S. has already blacklisted dozens of entities and people for affiliations with the Guards, but not the organization as a whole."

Said President Trump of the occasion on Monday: “This unprecedented step, led by the Department of State, recognizes the reality that Iran is not only a State Sponsor of Terrorism, but that the IRGC actively participates in, finances, and promotes terrorism as a tool of statecraft…The IRGC is the Iranian government’s primary means of directing and implementing its global terrorist campaign.”

SecState Mike Pompeo was out early promoting the move, telling reporters, “The leaders of Iran are racketeers, not revolutionaries.” Pompeo later went on Fox News to tell host Bret Baier the decision “will save American lives.” Pompeo did not elaborate on how the move will do that, a point that Gordon Lubold, your original D-Brief-er now at the Wall Street Journal, would like more info on.  

A question: Baier asked Pompeo: Will grouping the IRCG in the same terrorist category as ISIS put U.S. troops in Middle East at greater risk? Responded America’s top diplomat: “The IRGC is a terrorist organization; we’ve now designated them. We’re always doing everything we can to make sure we protect every American soldier everywhere...But the fact is, the IRGC has already killed over 600 American soldiers, so you can't have peace, you can't have stability, you can't have security in the Middle East without weakening the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps." Read the rest at Fox, here.

I know you are but what am I. “Within hours of the Trump administration’s declaration,” the Associated Press reports from Tehran, “Iran’s Supreme National Security Council responded by designating the U.S. Central Command, also known as CENTCOM, and all its forces as terrorist, and labeling the U.S. a ‘supporter of terrorism.’” Find that statement in full, here.

Iranian President Rouhani later called White House’s decision is a “mistake,” Reuters reports. And AP writes Iranian lawmakers convened their Tuesday meeting with chants of “Death to America,” with many of them wearing “the uniform of the guard in a show of support.” More on Iranian reax, here.

Welcoming the news: Saudi Arabia. “The U.S. decision translates the Kingdom’s repeated demands to the international community of the necessity of confronting terrorism supported by Iran,” Saudi state news said Monday.

Said Middle East analyst Randa Slim: “I really do not get all the dire predictions about an impending military collision between #US & #Iran b/c of IRGC FTO designation. What happened after Quds Force FTO designation? Nothing significant that I can recall.”

Added Brookings’ Suzanne Maloney: “The implications of this move are being vastly overdramatized by its opponents as well as its defenders. It's a microcosm of the dysfunctional polarization in the debates around Iran policy.”

Remember that time “the President helped build a hotel in Azerbaijan that appears to be a corrupt operation engineered by oligarchs tied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard?” Just Security’s Kate Brannen does. Here’s that 2017 story from The New Yorker, here.

Related event today in DC:Lessons Learned from the Iraq War,” a noon event from the Iran-watchers at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

Involved: Michael Gordon, national security correspondent for the Wall Street Journal; Col. (retired) Frank Sobchak, co-editor of the U.S. Army Iraq study; and Barbara Leaf, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates — and moderated by Bradley Bowman, senior director of FDD’s Center on Military and Political Power. Details/livestream link, here.


From Defense One

The Army Wants AI to Read Soldiers’ Minds // Patrick Tucker: A new study from the Army Research Lab may help AI-infused weapons and tools better understand their human operators.

Trump Removes Top DHS Staff // Govexec’s Eric Katz: The slew of departures, apparently without plan or precedent, drew bipartisan criticism on Capitol Hill.

Sorry, Florida, Looks Like You’re Not Getting US Space Command // Marcus Weisgerber: Despite lobbying, Sunshine State left off shortlist for command’s new headquarters.

The US Escalates Even Further Against Iran—To What End? // Kathy Gilsinan, The Atlantic: Declaring the country’s most powerful security services a terrorist organization is just the Trump administration’s latest move in a long pressure campaign against Iran.

Shakeup at Homeland Security as Border Pressures Mount // Katherine McIntire Peters: President Trump pledged to go in a "tougher" direction after withdrawing his nomination to lead ICE on Friday and accepting Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen's resignation on Sunday.

Welcome to this Tuesday edition of The D Brief by Ben Watson. Thanks for reading! And if you’re not subscribed, you can do that here. On this day in 1865, Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered his 28,000 troops to Union Gen. Ulysses S. Grant at Virginia’s Appomattox Court House, bringing an end to the American Civil War.


Three U.S. service members died Monday in Afghanistan from an IED blast near Bagram Air Base, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan announced. Three other U.S. troops were wounded in the contact, too. “The Taliban claimed credit for the attack, which involved a car bomb targeting a US military convoy near one of America's largest military facilities in Afghanistan,” CNN reported after the announcement.
AP reports “at least five Afghan civilians were wounded in the commotion after the attack,” at which point reportedly “American soldiers opened fire immediately after their convoy was bombed… Four were passers-by and the fifth was a driver of a car going down the road.”
The attack raises the number of U.S. military deaths in Afghanistan to seven (from four) in 2019. “13 were killed last year,” Fox adds.
As for what’s next in those U.S. peace talks with the Taliban, the group has “agreed to take part in an all-Afghan gathering later this month in Qatar,” AP writes. But still “the Taliban say they will not recognize any government official attending the gathering as a representative of the Kabul government, only as an individual Afghan participant.” A tiny bit more, here.

Acting SecDef pitches Space Force to space workforce. This morning, Patrick Shanahan and other top defense officials are in Colorado Springs at the annual Space Symposium, where they are expected to make an emphatic pitch for creating a Space Force, a new sixth branch of the military ordered up by President Trump. Shanahan is expected to focus on the threats posed to America’s military satellites by China and Russia, Defense One’s Marcus Weisgerber reports.
Excerpts from Shanahan’s speech, as prepared for delivery: “We must confront reality…Both China and Russia have weaponized space with the intent to hold American space capabilities at risk…The next major conflict may be won or lost in space…Given the changes in the environment, we are now need a military service dedicated to protecting and defending space — the Space Force.”
Other speakers will include: Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, Gen. David Goldfein, the Air Force chief of staff, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, and Gen. John Hyten, commander of U.S. Strategic Command.
“Space Week” — as defense officials have dubbed the next few days — will culminate with a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Thursday morning.

The U.S. is “confident” former Marine Austin Tice is still alive somewhere in Syria — and “The Trump administration could open a public channel with the Syrian regime if Damascus releases” Tice, The National’s Joyce Karam reported Monday after speaking to U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs Robert O’Brien.

The 32-year-old Chinese woman detained from Mar-a-Lago on March 30? The story continues to unfold. Investigators reportedly entered her hotel room and found an additional cell phone, a radio frequency device that detects hidden cameras, nine USB drives, five SIM cards, several debit cards and about $8,000 in cash, including about $700 in Chinese currency, The New York Times reported Monday. What’s more, “Ms. Zhang came to the United States on March 28 from Shanghai on a B-1 visa that has been revoked, meaning that if the court does release her from jail pending trial, she would be transferred to immigration custody,” according to Assistant United States Attorney Rolando Garcia.
Is this thing on? In one embarrassing side note, “four-and-a-half hour interrogation of Ms. Zhang was recorded by video… but [the recording] lacked sound because [the investigator] didn’t realize that the agency’s office in Palm Beach didn’t have that capability.”
One Secret Service agent “put Zhang’s thumb drive into his computer,” where “it immediately began to install files, a ‘very out-of-the-ordinary’ event that he had never seen happen before during this kind of analysis,” another agent told a judge, the Miami Herald reported. IT Twitter nearly lost its mind over the idea that one might plug a potentially malware-laden thumb drive from a mysterious Chinese national into one’s PC.
What next? The judge yesterday “postponed a decision on whether to release Ms. Zhang on bond until next Monday,” the Times writes. “Prosecutors said a more detailed indictment would be filed before then.” Read on, here.

In border security news today, a U.S. judge just halted the White House policy of returning asylum seekers to Mexico, Reuters reports. "The ruling is slated to take effect on Friday" and will apply nationwide.
Tweeted POTUS in reply on Monday evening: “A 9th Circuit Judge just ruled that Mexico is too dangerous for migrants. So unfair to the U.S. OUT OF CONTROL!”
WH options include appealing the ruling, Reuters writes, “and the government could seek a stay of the injunction until the appeals process runs its course.” More here.
Extra reading:Inside 12 days of turmoil that shook Homeland Security,” via AP.

ICYMI: Five former SOUTHCOM commanders condemned the White House’s decision to cut aid to Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador — aka, the Northern Triangle countries — on Monday. Find their short letter explaining as much (PDF) here.
The five former commanders (and their SOUTHCOM tenures):

  • Army Gen. Bantz Craddock (2004-2006)
  • Army Gen. James Hill (2002-2004)
  • Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey (1994-1996)
  • Navy Adm. James Stavridis (2006-2009)
  • Marine Corps Gen. Charles Wilhelm (1997-2000)

Happening today on Capitol Hill: SecState Pompeo testifies before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, which oversees funding for the State Department and USAID.

Happening tomorrow in Washington: South Korea’s President Moon Jae-in visits town ahead of a face-to-face meeting with President Trump on Thursday. Voice of America has a preview of that meeting, here.
Related: South Korea’s military just replaced its Army, Air Force and Marine Corps chiefs, the Korea Herald reported Monday.

The more you know: classified leaks edition. "The number of leaks of classified information reported as potential crimes by federal agencies reached record high levels during the first two years of the Trump Administration,” the Federation of American Scientists’ Steven Aftergood wrote Monday off of new data released last week by the Justice Department.
For the record, Aftergood writes, “Agencies transmitted 120 leak referrals to the Justice Department in 2017, and 88 leak referrals in 2018, for an average of 104 per year. By comparison, the average number of leak referrals during the Obama Administration (2009–2016) was 39 per year.”
And in case you’re wondering, “only a fraction of the classified leaks that are reported by agencies ever result in an investigation, and only a portion of those lead to identification of a suspect and even fewer to a prosecution.” Read more, here.

Developing news: An F-35 might be missing in Japan...

And finally today: “U.S. drones assisted Ugandan security forces in [the] recovery of [an] American woman and her Ugandan driver following kidnapping in Queen Elizabeth National Park” on Sunday, Fox’s Lucas Tomlinson tweeted Monday. CNN has what’s known so far about the story of California gorilla-watcher Kimberly Sue Endicott’s rescue from the Democratic Republic of Congo, here.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.