Rangers from the 75th Ranger Regiment train at Fort Benning, Ga.

Rangers from the 75th Ranger Regiment train at Fort Benning, Ga. Pfc. Eric Overfelt/U.S. Army

Special Operators Are Getting a Bit More Much-Needed Rest

At least two SOF components are on a ‘glide path’ to the Pentagon’s desired optempo.

U.S. special operations forces, long overtaxed by 16 years of war, are getting a bit more time between deployments, component commanders told lawmakers Wednesday.

The Pentagon’s goal of having active duty troops spend just one day deployed for each two days at home — what it calls a 1:2 dwell ratio — remains largely aspirational for most of the services. But the leaders of the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine special operations commands told the Senate Armed Services Emerging Threats subcommittee that the Preservation of the Force and Family program had helped put them on more a sustainable trajectory.

The Army Special Operations Command, for example, “is on [a] glide path to achieve the [Defense Secretary’s] directed 1:2 deployment to dwell ratio by the end of 2018,” wrote its commander, Lt. Gen. Kenneth Tovo, in submitted testimony.

The Air Force is also working to meet that goal. Currently “I have 12 percent of my force that is below a 1:2 dwell. None that are below a 1:1 at this point,” said Lt. Gen. Marshall Webb, who leads Air Force Special Operations Command.

Parts of the Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command force are at a higher operational tempo, but it’s “manageable,” their commander said.

“Currently our special operators average one day overseas for every 1.9 days at home, and our capability specialists — such as communicators, intelligence specialists, explosive ordnance technicians and the like — tend to have higher tempo that varies between 1.5 and just less than one day home for every day deployed,” said Maj. Gen. Carl Mundy. “While high, this operational tempo is manageable.”

But even as the services make strides, there’s still an accrued exhaustion in their special operations units.

“At this stage in the ongoing counter-violent extremist type of fight, it is not a rare exception for airmen to be on their 12th, 13th, or 14th deployment,” Webb said.

Just last year, Owen West, then the nominee for assistant secretary for special operations and low-intensity conflict, told senators during his confirmation hearing that it was time to re-evaluate which missions got assigned to special operations forces.

At first blush, the U.S. Army’s new Security Assistance Force Brigades may seem a great fit for reducing demands on special operators. But that’s a long way off, Tovo said.

The first SFAB deployed to Afghanistan earlier this year, but they’re advising conventional Afghan troops — a mission the Army special forces didn’t have. USASOC is an “indirect beneficiary of that,” Tovo said, because now there will be a stronger conventional force to hold territory that his troops liberated with Afghan special operations forces.

“At this point I don’t see it supplanting what we are currently doing,” he said. “Sometime in the future, in other environments, can we see SFABs employed, doing some of the work that right now we have SOF teams doing? That’s certainly a possibility, but right now it hasn’t developed that way.”