Air Force Capt. Lauren Bauer swears in future Space Force Guardians during a ceremony at the Pima Air and Space Museum in Tucson, Ariz., Jan. 15, 2022.

Air Force Capt. Lauren Bauer swears in future Space Force Guardians during a ceremony at the Pima Air and Space Museum in Tucson, Ariz., Jan. 15, 2022. U.S. Air Force / Staff Sgt. Kristine Legate

The Space Force Isn’t a Military Service

Unlike its sister branches, it doesn’t deal in violence. It needs a different model.

The U.S. Space Force has a problem: the public does not know it is a military service. Guardians have trouble receiving the special recognition from the airlines given to the other service members, and they lack access to special license plates as well. Ironically, though, the public instinctively knows what those who created the Space Force do not. Whatever the law might call it, the USSF is not, in fact, a military service. 

What it does is absolutely vital to America’s national security, but it lacks the core relationship to organized violence that defines the other services. Thus, by making the Space Force a military service, Congress has done it a disservice, forcing a poorly suited organizational identity onto it in the process. Fortunately for the Space Force and its leaders, there are other models that it might look to as its culture and identity take shape. But let’s look first at the reasons the military-service model is a bad fit.

First, the Space Force lacks the formative wartime experiences to give it credibility as an independent service. By comparison, World War II, for example, provided such experiences for the USSF’s parent service, the U.S. Air Force. The Air Force itself bristled under the control of its own senior service, the U.S. Army, for decades prior to World War II. Once America entered the war, the then-Army Air Forces brought to both major theaters of war a theory of victory through airpower. In the United Kingdom-based Eighth Air Force alone, 26,000 airmen died attempting to turn this theory into practice. As controversial as the strategic bombing campaign was, the airmen’s efforts and sacrifices impressed their fellow Americans and provided much of the impetus for service independence after the war. No such defining experience or theory of victory underpin the USSF. 

Second, this lack of formative experiences makes it difficult to create an internal narrative to shape the Space Force’s identity and organizational culture. As I’ve argued separately, military services provide organized violence-based solutions to national problems. To achieve this objective, services traditionally created more hierarchical organizations, emphasized physical hardship, and stressed operating in closer proximity to violence than their civilian counterparts. Especially in last few decades, the adherence to these characteristics has waned somewhat, but the relationship to organized violence remains central to military service cultural identity. The USSF’s tie to organized violence is fundamentally different. To the extent it physically strikes anything, its targets are satellite, not people. Disruption or destruction of the satellite might ultimately cost human lives, but the connection to violence against humans is much less direct and difficult to discern. Thus, organizationally, USSF leaders potentially create profound dissonance for their fellow guardians if they attempt to mimic an internal culture and create an internal narrative more akin to the other services, rather than allowing a unique culture to emerge organically.

Third, the Space Force’s designation as a military service drives guardian leadership to create staffs and structures to compete directly with the other services for resources and attention within the Defense Department. This means that, although the USSF is very small compared to the other services, nonetheless it will create a large staff relative to its own size, and pursue more peripheral undertakings such as building international ties or educational programs. Such activities might eventually be important, but they are hard to pursue effectively until guardians themselves better understand their organization and its culture.

Fourth, one of the reasons the Space Force is so small is that it excludes many key space and missile defense missions, to include those performed by the other services and organizations such as the National Reconnaissance Office and the Missile Defense Agency. A growing overlap in the strategic air missions after World War II led to bitter roles-and-missions debates among the services. The same is likely to happen as the number of space-oriented organizations grow, and organizational prerogatives inevitably come into conflict as a result. This means at some point the USSF will find itself in competition with other defense and space agencies, as well as the other military services over key responsibilities. If this is the case, it will be consumed by internal and public debates over exactly what role it is supposed to fulfill under the law, and it will struggle for credibility with Congress and the public.

Fifth, like many other U.S government space organizations, one of the key challenges facing Space Force leaders is its heavy reliance on civilians, especially contractors. As a recent RAND study noted, contractors comprise about one-third of the personnel at the former Air Force Space Command, which is now the USSF’s Space Operation Command. Moreover, these contractors “substantially contribute to operational space missions” and “often have more systems and technical expertise than the uniformed and civilian personnel they support.” Thus, USSF leaders face a daunting task creating a unique service organizational culture when so much of its talent resides outside its uniformed guardian ranks. Indeed, the larger likelihood is that seasoned contractors will shape the force’s culture more than any comparable official effort to do so. 

Finally, with so many government agencies and private companies competing for space missions, the Space Force has had a minimal role in shaping its public narrative. Yet, this public narrative is core to service identity and culture, reinforcing for service members that they serve a higher purpose. Right now, arguably other U.S. government organizations, such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, dominate the space narrative with activities such as the deployment of the James Webb space telescope. In addition, private companies like SpaceX play a key role in shaping the narrative through commercial initiatives like expanded space tourism. Beyond organizational culture, more pragmatically, the public narrative also functions as a proxy for a service’s value proposition to the nation. The more the nation values a service, the more resources and public esteem follow. Based on material in the public domain, USSF’s value proposition to the American people remains relatively low compared to the other services and other space organizations.

All this leads to the conclusion that the USSF is a different kind of organization, most likely invaluable to the nation, but not a military service. So what is it and where should it look for inspiration? 

The Space Force is what I’ve (coincidentally) referred to elsewhere as a guardian force. That is, an institution vital to the nation’s security but only loosely tied to providing organized-violence based solutions to national problems. In many ways, guardian forces serve as the successor organizations to the intelligence organizations that emerged shortly after World War II, most notably the National Security Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office. Both tackled large national intelligence problems, to include how to provide effective early warning in order to avoid another Pearl Harbor, as well as to how to understand the Soviet Union’s Cold War nuclear and conventional military capabilities with limited in-country access. 

Indeed, if USSF guardians look at the NRO, in particular, they will find a compelling organizational narrative rooted in solving a large national security problem, looking to space as the operational area for its solution, and relying heavily on civilians for leadership and expertise. As with most compelling narratives, the NRO’s has controversial moments; but, in no way do they detract from its success in uniquely using space technologies to understand Soviet military capabilities. The USSF similarities to the NRO are unassailable on the latter two elements. Space provides the physical medium for its operations and the USSF relies heavily on civilians. What remains uncertain is the enduring national problem the USSF is uniquely suited to address. Until that is commonly understood, commercial space, NASA, and the intelligence community will continue to shape space operations and associated narratives; and, the USSF will continue its uneasy relationship with other four military services. 

This all means that USSF leaders’ most pressing challenge is translating anodyne Title 10 functions into an important national problem needing a solution. They will realize that organized violence is neither core to the problem nor to its solution—and that the Space Force must look for inspiration not to its sister service branches, but elsewhere.

Paula G. Thornhill is a retired U.S. Air Force brigadier general. She is an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University (SAIS) and is the author of Demystifying the American Military.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.